Sponsorship Background
SponsorPark
Sponsorship Search
Category 
Location 
Price Range 
 to 
Advanced Search

SPONSORPARK'S BLOG >

Turn off the Beats

by David Rachell
  
20 10 2014

The NFL fined San Francisco quarterback Colin Kaepernick for wearing Beats by Dre headphones at a news conference following the Niner’s win over the Kansas City Chiefs.  The NFL’s new Bose sponsorship is exclusive and therefore the NFL has banned any other headphone brand to appear in or around NFL activity.  

While it may seem audacious, the NFL should prevent players from wearing, eating, drinking, playing or performing in or around any NFL event that doesn’t include official sponsors.  It may be their football, their rules, but the NFL is protecting their brand, players and sponsors.

Cam Newton, Richard Sherman, Barry Church and other players were also spotted wearing their Beats by Dre’s this weekend around the stadium.  These players are seemingly defying the NFL because they think it’s important to protect their individual sponsors.  But, here’s what these players DON’T understand.
 
The NFL is protecting their sponsors, sponsors that make it feasible for Cam Newton, Richard Sherman, Colin Kaepernick and other players to enjoy big contracts.  If the NFL doesn’t protect Bose, they set the precedent for future sponsors.  The value erodes when a property doesn’t protect their agreements.  Players should not only be fined, but suspended without pay for defying sponsor agreements.  It sounds harsh, but as old trekies would site, “the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.”

The same rule applies whether you’re running a professional football league or a local little league. Whether a festival or event producer, you have an obligation to protect your sponsor because in reality, you’re protecting your event too.  You’re assuring and protecting the integrity of your sponsorship program and the reputation of your organization within the sponsorship world. 

If you have a rogue vendor that decides to bring their own water to sell rather than use the official water of you’re event, you need to lose that vendor. Believe me, the lost vendor fee is not worth losing the integrity of your sponsorship program.  After all, it’s your football, your rules and your reputation.

Categories:   contracts | General | industry happenings
Actions:   | Permalink | Comments (0) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

A League of Their Own

by David Rachell
  
9 10 2014
About every sports league in the world has had its own share of scandals and PR crisis. Since the NFL is the biggest sports league in the largest economy in the world, it is a fair statement that the league is one of the most powerful on the planet.

Perhaps the biggest story to come out of 2014 might end up being that this was the year that started the downfall of the NFL reign.  One only needs to look at two main areas to confirm whether the league stumbles; its viewership and corporate sponsorship.  If viewership and attendance begin to decline, it’s assured that NFL sponsors may resist continuing the relationship and TV ratings will result in lower fees paid by the networks. As sponsors and ratings wane, money tightens and the quality on the field lags.

Player concussions, followed by medical issues among former players and the addition of HGH testing among current players began the consternation last year.  Understand that the Ray Rice incident was not the beginning of the domestic violence issue, but the culmination of many incidents in the league for years. High profile players, like Adrian Peterson, have only recently exacerbated this issue.  A research report by FiveThirtyEight.com website confirms that the NFL players do have an inordinately high rate of domestic violence and confirms the league has a legitimate issue on its hands

Some NFL sponsors have been critical. AB InBev has a $1 billion stake in the NFL and stated they’re keeping a watchful eye on the situation – meaning the NFL better do something about it before the home of Budweiser considers changes. Others have suspended their sponsorship, like Radisson Hotels and P&G’s Crest toothpaste.  Their decision has resulted in greater positive buzz for those brands.  Radisson Hotels saw a huge jump in positive traffic in their social media space within 48 hours of its declaration. Other sponsors, like Cover Girl, have been steadfast in their support of the league. 


Initial indications show that the NFL is still experiencing viewership growth.  More people are attending games and all indications are that there’s an NFL growth spurt, financially and in popularity, despite the controversy. So, do sponsors really have a responsibility to the public to remove themselves from a situation that is controversial when the NFL’s fan base continues to grow?  Do sponsors that react quickly garner greater results when removing themselves from a crisis?  Or, do sponsors that work with the property (in this case – the NFL) to improve the situation result in future reward?

There’s a lesson to be learned not only about how the NFL handles the situation, but the reaction to the NFL by its fans and the general public.  A Reuters/Ipsos poll among Americans revealed that more than half believe that major sponsors should end their relationship with the league for the season or permanently.  Yet, as one person put it - "The only way to hurt the NFL and get its attention is with money," said one poll respondent. But the responded indicated he was still watching pro football on television. "It hasn't gotten to the point to where I would not watch it.”  See more here.

The NFL’s actions over the next few months may just seal the fate of its power for the next few years and interest among fans.  Should the NFL begin to lose its sponsor grip, look for other leagues and major events within NFL markets to find ways to increase their relationships with companies.  Properties need to prepare for how they can engage possible sponsors in a similar fashion, offering amenities that mirror the NFL model.

Categories:  
Actions:   | Permalink | Comments (0) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

Secret Strategies for Setting Sponsorship Prices

by David Rachell
  
17 02 2014

In January, SponsorPark hosted a webinar with sponsorship guru Ron Seaver. Ron offered attendees great advice on how to approach potential sponsors. Developing relationships with sponsors isn’t about making them understanding what you do, but rather your understanding of THEIR organizational needs.

Corporate sponsors simply aren’t that interested in your organizational mission or cause, but rather how you can help them use their relationship with you to reach their business objectives. While it sounds harsh, it’s not because they do not “care.” It’s because they have goals and objectives to meet and sponsorship is a tactic employed in meeting those objectives. It’s your job to showcase how your event or organization will be able to help them meet those objectives. This requires research and a strong game plan demonstrating your understanding of their needs.

Ron had intended to site resources and provide additional information during the webinar, but we weren't able to fit all of that great information and answer your questions in just one hour. So, Ron as graciously agreed to come back and present the Secret Strategies for Setting Sponsorship Prices and expounding on the past webinar. The webinar will be held Thursday, February 20, from 2 – 3 p.m. CST.

How the value for a sponsorship opportunity is derived is so important for sponsorship sellers to understand. So, Ron is going to share insight into some of the tactics companies use to garner that value and how you can meet those expectations. Sign up to attend the webinar by going here.

Remember, now through March 4, you can sign up for Ron Seaver’s Sponsorship Boot Camp April 3-4 in San Diego and receive 2 full-registrations for the price of one. AND you will also receive a year’s subscription to SponsorPark.com’s Premium Membership. Information on the Boot Camp and sign up instructions are available by going to here.

Categories:   General | Sponsorship resources | sponsorship sales | Sponsorship Valuation
Actions:   | Permalink | Comments (0) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed